Discussion:
Fog Documentation
Kyle Rames
2013-01-16 14:27:06 UTC
Permalink
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I am
looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
documentation:

* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables

Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?

I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/
Thoughts?

I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root level of
the fog repository.

I welcome your feedback!

Thanks!

Kyle
geemus (Wesley Beary)
2013-01-16 17:14:53 UTC
Permalink
Those sound like good things to add.

We've moved the bulk of the docs into its own repo here:
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com

So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.

Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the things
you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').

Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying to
figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.

An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the root
level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at the
root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.

Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I am
looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root level
of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
Kyle Rames
2013-01-16 20:29:06 UTC
Permalink
Thanks for the feedback Wes.

I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and debugging
section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace specific
information into a README in the appropriate location.

As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we will
get a better feeling about where they belong.

Thanks again for the help!

Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the things
you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying to
figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I
am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root level
of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
Kyle Rames
2013-03-07 15:09:36 UTC
Permalink
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.

I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On this
page we could have links to provider specific documentation and examples.
In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.

To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from the
top level readme in the github repo.

If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt the
first iteration of this page.

Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and debugging
section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace specific
information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we will
get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the things
you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying to
figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I
am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root level
of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
geemus (Wesley Beary)
2013-03-07 16:41:24 UTC
Permalink
Sounds good to me.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt the
first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/**fog.github.com<https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com>
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the things
you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying to
figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I
am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/**documentation/userguide/<http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/>Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
unknown
2013-03-12 15:25:01 UTC
Permalink
I'm happy to help, I've written a few scripts to do basic functions for
AWS, and could really have used the help. They do pretty easy things,
and illustrate typical features.

Currently working on some things with VSphere, and would really like to see
what other people have done.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt the
first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the things
you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying to
figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular, I
am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of abstracting
cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation specific
details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should have a page
with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the approach
jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Kyle Rames
2013-03-12 15:47:46 UTC
Permalink
Excellent! I this information is going to be a huge boon to the fog
community.

The current plan, correct me if I am wrong geemus, is to create a docs and
example sub directory in each provider. Similar to what I did for Rackspace.

https://github.com/fog/fog/tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace

We are then going to add an additional page on fog.io and the github
readme,md to point to this information. (You are more than welcome to get
this page started if you want.)

Kyle
Post by unknown
I'm happy to help, I've written a few scripts to do basic functions for
AWS, and could really have used the help. They do pretty easy things,
and illustrate typical features.
Currently working on some things with VSphere, and would really like to
see what other people have done.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt
the first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the
things you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying
to figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular,
I am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of
abstracting cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation
specific details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should
have a page with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the
approach jclouds has taken.
http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/ Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Kyle Rames
2013-03-12 15:50:03 UTC
Permalink
Excellent! I think this information is going to be a huge boon to the fog
community.

The current plan, correct me if I am wrong geemus, is to create a docs and
example sub directory in each provider. Similar to what I did for Rackspace.

https://github.com/fog/fog/tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace

We are then going to add an additional page on fog.io and the github
readme.md to point to this information. (You are more than welcome to get
this page started if you would like.)

Kyle
Post by unknown
I'm happy to help, I've written a few scripts to do basic functions for
AWS, and could really have used the help. They do pretty easy things,
and illustrate typical features.
Currently working on some things with VSphere, and would really like to
see what other people have done.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt
the first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the
things you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying
to figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular,
I am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of
abstracting cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation
specific details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should
have a page with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the
approach jclouds has taken.
http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/ Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
geemus (Wesley Beary)
2013-03-12 15:51:22 UTC
Permalink
Sounds good to me!
Post by Kyle Rames
Excellent! I think this information is going to be a huge boon to the fog
community.
The current plan, correct me if I am wrong geemus, is to create a docs and
example sub directory in each provider. Similar to what I did for Rackspace.
https://github.com/fog/fog/**tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace<https://github.com/fog/fog/tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace>
We are then going to add an additional page on fog.io and the github
readme.md to point to this information. (You are more than welcome to get
this page started if you would like.)
Kyle
Post by unknown
I'm happy to help, I've written a few scripts to do basic functions for
AWS, and could really have used the help. They do pretty easy things,
and illustrate typical features.
Currently working on some things with VSphere, and would really like to
see what other people have done.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt
the first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/**fog.github.com<https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com>
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the
things you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying
to figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at the
root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be at
the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in the
existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That said,
I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In particular,
I am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the existing
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of
abstracting cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation
specific details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should
have a page with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the
approach jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/**
documentation/userguide/<http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/>Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Kyle Rames
2013-04-01 16:08:57 UTC
Permalink
In order to make the provider specific documentation more visible to
developers, I have introduced a new top level page to fog.io in the
following pull request:

https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com/pull/5

What are everyone's thoughts on this change?

Thanks!

Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Sounds good to me!
Post by Kyle Rames
Excellent! I think this information is going to be a huge boon to the fog
community.
The current plan, correct me if I am wrong geemus, is to create a docs
and example sub directory in each provider. Similar to what I did for
Rackspace.
https://github.com/fog/fog/**tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace<https://github.com/fog/fog/tree/master/lib/fog/rackspace>
We are then going to add an additional page on fog.io and the github
readme.md to point to this information. (You are more than welcome to
get this page started if you would like.)
Kyle
Post by unknown
I'm happy to help, I've written a few scripts to do basic functions for
AWS, and could really have used the help. They do pretty easy things,
and illustrate typical features.
Currently working on some things with VSphere, and would really like to
see what other people have done.
Post by Kyle Rames
Now that my mind is back on documentation, I wanted to propose a
(temporary) solution to this problem.
I think we should add a top level menu to fog.io called Providers. On
this page we could have links to provider specific documentation and
examples. In addition, I think we should incorporate #1419<https://github.com/fog/fog/issues/1419> into
this request as well.
To optimize visibility, I think we should have a link to this page from
the top level readme in the github repo.
If everyone is receptive to this I idea, I would be willing to attempt
the first iteration of this page.
Kyle
Post by Kyle Rames
Thanks for the feedback Wes.
I will plan on adding the Prerequisites, Installation, .fog, and
debugging section to the Getting Started section and the more Rackspace
specific information into a README in the appropriate location.
As far as the samples, let me come up with a few of them and maybe we
will get a better feeling about where they belong.
Thanks again for the help!
Kyle
Post by geemus (Wesley Beary)
Those sound like good things to add.
https://github.com/fog/**fog.github.com<https://github.com/fog/fog.github.com>
So you can feel free to add extra pages/sections there and/or issues
tracking missing features.
Right now most of that is pretty high level, which means that the
things you are describing should fit (perhaps under 'about').
Specific implementation details are still something we've been trying
to figure out. Currently we've started adding README files to specific sub
directories (HP has one for instance) to go over specifics. I think this is
good-enough for a start but we should probably figure out how to also
organize this info on the web page.
An examples directory also could work, not sure if it should be at
the root level vs in a subdirectory. For some things it makes sense to be
at the root level, but I think those examples are fairly well covered in
the existing web page docs for the shared/top level abstractions. That
said, I'm certainly happy to discuss this further.
Thanks!
wes
Post by Kyle Rames
I am interested in contributing the fog documentation. In
particular, I am looking at would like to add a couple sections to the
* Prerequisites - Ruby versions supported and unofficially supported
* Installation - gem install via gemcutter as well as source from github
* .fog - What a .fog file, where it is located, and what it contains
* Debugging - DEBUG and EXCON_DEBUG environment variables
Does anyone have a preference where this information should be located?
I have also noticed that while fog does an excellent job of
abstracting cloud concepts at a certain level there are implementation
specific details. In order to better spell these out, I think we should
have a page with links to implementation specific details. Similar to the
approach jclouds has taken. http://www.jclouds.org/**
documentation/userguide/<http://www.jclouds.org/documentation/userguide/>Thoughts?
I would also like to propose creating an example directory at root
level of the fog repository.
I welcome your feedback!
Thanks!
Kyle
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ruby-fog+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/***@public.gmane.org
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Loading...